• Prunebutt@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    Yes, it was a stupid mistake. Doesn’t change the definition of “leaking” (as in: information got out that the person supplying the info didn’t want to get out), though.

    • RogueBanana@piefed.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      What information? There was no leak, he was identified by telemetry id which overlapped with multiple previous offences.

      • Prunebutt@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        What information?

        You answered your own question already. He leaked identifying information (his telemetry id) himself.

        • RogueBanana@piefed.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          20 hours ago

          No? Microsoft cooperated with the cops to match the ids and identified him. He did not just give out his id like a business card.

          • Prunebutt@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            19 hours ago

            Ob-iously, he left identifying information at his target. So he leaked it.

            An information leak is a leak, even if it’s not happening to a company.

              • Prunebutt@slrpnk.net
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                18 hours ago

                Read a few comments to the top: It uas a device ID.

                If you don’t think that counts as information, then I got nothing more to tell you.

                You bore me, bye:

        • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          22 hours ago

          If you’re holding out a big ass sign “Hi I’m X” then someone finding out that you’re X isn’t exactly a leak, innit