A woman drives with both hands on the wheel. Her phone sits face-down on her lap. No officer pulls her over. No lights flash. Weeks later, a $1,251 ticket arrives in the mail. The evidence: a single frame from a Camera surveillance app. The charge: phone use while driving.

Automated camera companies market their devices as automated license plate readers — tools for catching stolen cars, flagging warrants, and aiding serious investigations.

Sold as a Crime Tool. Used as a Fine Machine.

  • Formfiller@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    14 hours ago

    They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.

    Benjamin Franklin

    • 1984@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Just think how safe the world would be if everyone was monitored 24 hours per day, for their safety of course.

    • jdr@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Funny, isn’t liberty an inalienable right granted by The Creator?

        • jdr@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Are you sure? He definitely said and wrote things to the contrary, including the Declaration of Independence.

          I never doubted, for instance, the existence of the Deity; that He made the world, and governed it by His providence; that the most acceptable service of God was the doing good to man; that our souls are immortal; and that all crime will be punished, and virtue rewarded, either here or hereafter.

          I have no dog in this race, being neither American nor religious, but it seems like an important historical detail.

          • Formfiller@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 hours ago

            Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof

            • jdr@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              44 minutes ago

              I think we can agree he was a critic of organized religion, and that it’s pretty enlightened to not have the state impose religion on anyone.

              That said I still think he (at least for a large chunk of his life) believed in the existence of a god, the god of Abraham/Christianity in particular.