TL;DR she actually agreed to sell and is now bitching and whining on Tiktok that they are “taking” it and using her kids as sob material.
Bruh. That title and framing is disingenuous. I don’t care it’s “driven” by datacenters. The power grid would need to be upgraded at some point anyway.
There’s no “theft” to call out if YOU’RE GETTING PAID, IN A DEAL.
No but in my book you can’t agree to the first presented deal, then complain online about theft. It’s not theft. It’s a deal, datacenter involved or not.
She laid down and surrendered without a fight and now regrets it so she took to tiktok to farm fame off the dataventer bad trope. They are bad, but in this case, they made a deal, they didn’t steal anything.
Let’s try something different : Where are YOURSOURCES? Tell me why this is illegal - with sources now, don’t be shy. Show us all the laws that were broken.
I’ve already given you two sources. It’s too bad you’re too busy writing nonsense that you can’t be bothered to see what’s been put in front of your nose.
Show me where the law was broken or pound sand. It’s really that simple.
I’m not that guy but I went back and watched uo to minute 1. All they said is that the land is their family’s. Okay and?
They say later that the power company could also try to get the land via Eminent Domain. So? They didn’t even get there because she took the deal. She would’ve received compensation anyway. How substantial that would be, WOULD be up for debate, IF she didn’t sign a deal.
TL;DR she actually agreed to sell and is now bitching and whining on Tiktok that they are “taking” it and using her kids as sob material.
Bruh. That title and framing is disingenuous. I don’t care it’s “driven” by datacenters. The power grid would need to be upgraded at some point anyway.
There’s no “theft” to call out if YOU’RE GETTING PAID, IN A DEAL.
And what if they didn’t sell? The datacenter is just gonna respect that decision?
No but in my book you can’t agree to the first presented deal, then complain online about theft. It’s not theft. It’s a deal, datacenter involved or not.
She laid down and surrendered without a fight and now regrets it so she took to tiktok to farm fame off the dataventer bad trope. They are bad, but in this case, they made a deal, they didn’t steal anything.
Other poster said that too but where are the sources
I was being genuine in my other response to you, but this comment makes me wonder if you watched the vid or just came to comment.
You still haven’t posted any sources. I’m not watching the video again. Also not trying to fight with you.
You don’t want to watch the roughly 30 sec in the middle where it explains exactly what you’re asking?
Ok
Here: https://highways.dot.gov/federal-lands/pddm/right-way-utilities.
Read for HOURS instead.
what are you on about, i did ask you for an explanation
my bad is i forgot to give a hoot. turns out i can get a cool cheap whatevr thingy that reads books
I expect to see you quoting me or or railing against me because you don’t understand journalism attribution
Let’s try something different : Where are YOUR SOURCES? Tell me why this is illegal - with sources now, don’t be shy. Show us all the laws that were broken.
I’ve already given you two sources. It’s too bad you’re too busy writing nonsense that you can’t be bothered to see what’s been put in front of your nose.
Show me where the law was broken or pound sand. It’s really that simple.
Alright bud this is hilarious maybe
When posting, as I presume you were not even shit posting, We all have an obligation to speak clearly and explain where the information originated.
I apologize as I can be guilty of same but this is it a specific area where you have drawn a line but can’t even back up your own business.
No, I’m not watching any more videos
funny thing about journalism. obligations ensue
I’m not that guy but I went back and watched uo to minute 1. All they said is that the land is their family’s. Okay and?
They say later that the power company could also try to get the land via Eminent Domain. So? They didn’t even get there because she took the deal. She would’ve received compensation anyway. How substantial that would be, WOULD be up for debate, IF she didn’t sign a deal.