The dev of Tesseract is part of the .world mod/admin team.

EDIT: Ironically, just like you.

What do you mean? I’m not part of the .world team, I only mod a few communities that are on there.

The banner at the top of their site tells a different story

Cryptocurrency projects are no longer allowed. View change

But that was done by the dev of Tesseract, not by the people running Lemmy.world

I don’t like these blanket bans, are they going to ban torrent clients next?

It seems none of the communities I mod have made the list this time

self-training is possible when using something external to validate the results

I don’t think the cost of hosting the repositories itself is the issue, more the legal problems and the fact that real projects get drowned out by the noise

It seems like the marketing cooperated on writing the incident report, but I felt it was still interesting to share considering the importance on public perception and what it tells about OpenAI’s PR strategy

Huggingface actually had to use an open model to analyze the attack because the guardrails of commerical API’s caused issues.

When we started the log analysis, we first used frontier models behind commercial APIs. This did not work: the analysis requires submitting large volumes of real attack commands, exploit payloads, and C2 artifacts, and these requests were blocked by the providers’ safety guardrails, which cannot distinguish an incident responder from an attacker. We ran the forensic analysis instead on GLM 5.2, an open-weight model, on our own infrastructure. This had a second benefit: no attacker data, and none of the credentials it referenced, left our environment.

Security incident disclosure — July 2026

And Chinese AI like Deepseek and GLM

It could also be a way to encourage more regulation to push out competition with compliance cost

From my personal experience, most companies don’t look at the benchmarks and simply buy “AI” from a company based on their perception of that company.

All the Chinese models are scary and “dangerous”, Grok too (but for slightly more legitimate reasons), Meta that’s Facebook and everyone knows they’re bad at privacy (even your boss), so they end up choosing Microsoft’s AI, OpenAI, or Anthropic.

For anyone interested in how they host it for $0.01/day, it’s https://www.nearlyfreespeech.net/

I’ve also lost my Free-Tier resources, I was barely using it too so I can’t imagine it cost much.

I do wonder if this is similar to Mythos, where the company deliberately stokes fears to get people talking about it and spread the assumption that it will actually happen and is a big deal (and to avoid people’s first question about whether it will actually work).

Luckily it probably won’t get made and the company will just rugpull their investors

Would DDR4 or DDR3 be easier to produce?

It’s interesting how certain companies and organizations have such large ranges, 16m IP’s each for both that old printer company and a farmaceutical company is a lot. It really shows the history of the internet and how seemingly certain companies that adopted it first ended up with huge chunks of the available IPv4 space.

Better than that

And even if they publish the model it’s almost always just open weights