Enabling ICE thugs pretty much looks like boot licking though.
To be clear: there’s no indication this wasn’t an ambush by thugs and yet you defend the ambush and criticise defending the attacked person.
Interesting that the shown aggression doesn’t get the perpetrators arrested, isn’t it?
But afair they can kill people in cold blood and don’t even get prosecuted in most cases.
You called my rational suggestion unhinged, so it implies you considered my suggestion wrong and hence what they did right.
Please explain how it’s different in your mind.
What role does it play?
If you can’t or don’t want to explain your comments, that’s fine.
But beware that will keep you looking like defending immoral and likely illegal behaviour.
Enabling ICE thugs pretty much looks like boot licking though.
To be clear: there’s no indication this wasn’t an ambush by thugs and yet you defend the ambush and criticise defending the attacked person.
Interesting that the shown aggression doesn’t get the perpetrators arrested, isn’t it?
But afair they can kill people in cold blood and don’t even get prosecuted in most cases.
This is what you’re defending. Disgusting!
Do you see me defending? Get outta here lol.
You called my rational suggestion unhinged, so it implies you considered my suggestion wrong and hence what they did right.
Please explain how it’s different in your mind.
What country are you posting from my unhinged friend?
What role does it play?
If you can’t or don’t want to explain your comments, that’s fine.
But beware that will keep you looking like defending immoral and likely illegal behaviour.
I’ve explained my comments you just don’t like what I say and seemingly want to promote unhinged behaviour on this platform.