not_IO@lemmy.blahaj.zone to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 16 hours agoso much winninglemmy.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square12fedilinkarrow-up1137
arrow-up1137imageso much winninglemmy.blahaj.zonenot_IO@lemmy.blahaj.zone to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 16 hours agomessage-square12fedilink
minus-squareGladaed@feddit.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up3·8 hours agoIt is not jumpy. It being close to zero can be fixed on your end by choosing proper y scale. A sudden change in value is different to a trend.
minus-squarenot_IO@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·edit-22 hours agoit went from .0008 to .0006 which is 25% down, its a logarithmic graph, if it keeps losing at a steady rate , you cant just zoom out and say it looks steady because of that
minus-squareGladaed@feddit.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 hour agoThat’s much less loss of value than 10 years ago. I didn’t say that.
It is not jumpy. It being close to zero can be fixed on your end by choosing proper y scale.
A sudden change in value is different to a trend.
it went from .0008 to .0006 which is 25% down, its a logarithmic graph, if it keeps losing at a steady rate , you cant just zoom out and say it looks steady because of that
That’s much less loss of value than 10 years ago. I didn’t say that.