Well they weren’t there when euros arrived

Everything can be verbed. Any word can be used as the act of doing said thing in english.

Is there a convenient way to do so? I guess one could screenshot into gem&I to ocr the text and pipe that into deepl but who tf has time for that.

Also that’s a passive aggressive way to tell people to be more inclusive.

Shake to ai summarize help text.

A or !A yes is more funny to me

Nsfl. Shows someone getting killed.

Mett is usually unseasoned as well and citrus juice is weird

Some few locations did not have a native population such as the Falklands

Basically being really fresh and made one the day of consumption. Also cooling it well and making sure the pig was healthy.

Raw pork is generally safe too, if you have proper handling in place.

Poultry is… Not recommended outside of Japan.

As a German I must sincerely condemn the bread type and ratio. Also: where are onions, salt and pepper?

Also use pork for God’s sake

This is an unanswerable question.

That’s only Australia. Smut is still banned here.

The right side

I am not. I am being ridiculous for comedic effect here.

Could have just gotten me by saying it’s Mr. Great Apespawn to you!

They are being even more ridiculous by claiming that abrahamites are worshippers of a thunder god. People and rites change over time. And even if there is evidence to a historic origin that does not change the value of your deeds of today. Ancient people are primarily one thing. That thing is being dead and forgotten.

They is you, anyway.

That’s because I chose a deliberately ridiculous term.

It’s technically correct, even more correct than calling abrahamites a storm god cult.

You assigned me a faith I did not display for not agreeing with you.

And you apespawn condemn people based on their history.

Your phrasing is deeply biased and not conducive to an objective debate. You flat out make outlandish claims while using dehumanizing or devaluing speech.

The article is bad and the author should feel bad. (Zoidberg noises)

Replacing parts of concrete by e.g. carbon is nothing new. Using graphite as a cheap graphene proxy is cheap and effective. (Graphite is basically graphene and extra bits and pieces)

Posing this as a way to get Coffee grounds out of landfills is misleading as there is no reason to send them there to begin with.

They don’t highlight why coffee grounds may be better suited than other organic waste.

You can use manufactured sand in concrete to get a very similar end product. Changing processes is work and hence avoided. But it is perfectly possible.