• printf("%s", name);@piefed.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    99
    ·
    2 days ago

    There is no stance that Mullvad can take on this in order to make me want to stay with them, since this is not an abstract, philosophical matter. It’s simple: Daniel partially owns a pro profit company. I pay Daniel’s company some money. Daniel reaps - as he should - parts of the company’s revenue as wage (which is my money). Daniel uses that wage to fund whatever the hell he wants - as he should - with my money. I’m either fine with contributing to this or not. Period. I am not fine with it, so I’m flirting with IVPN.

    • ramble81@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      2 days ago

      Thought experiment time…

      part of the company’s revenue as wage

      How far down the chain does that count for you? If there was a VP, Manager, or Individual Contributor that took their (personal) wages and donated to a cause you didn’t like, would you still pull your money?

      • printf("%s", name);@piefed.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        2 days ago

        Good question! I guess it does matter that he’s a cofounder and CEO. I honestly don’t know how I would react if we were talking about an employee instead. I’d deliberate and make up my mind there and then. Which sheds light on the fact that the matter isn’t as black and white as my comment made it sound.

        Possibly off topic:

        I work within the criminal justice system and I believe cops are pigs, while I know for a fact that there are good people on the force too. I wouldn’t give up my current position just because another “lowly” employee is rotten.

        • Random Dent@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          34
          ·
          2 days ago

          It’s also the scale of the donation for me. He didn’t just make a donation the way you or I probably would - his donation accounted for 72% of the party’s entire income for 2025. So the money that Mullvad makes is now tied to the continued existence of the party, albeit indirectly.

        • ramble81@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          It was something I didn’t have a good answer for either. I think ownership is a good criteria but then I was trying to figure out why it was to me. Since it’s passed to an individual, via salary, is it still “my money”?

          Amount could have something to do, but it’s possible for a highly paid IC to donate quite a bit.

          The one that is cut-and-dry for me is something like Chic-Fil-A. My money is going directly to their foundation, which is used against LGBTQ people, so that’s an immediate hard no.

          • chris@links.openriver.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            2 days ago

            He is providing that political party with over half of its income if I recall correctly.

            If Mullvad’s janitor were someone doing that and Mullvad refused to terminate them, I’d quit Mullvad.

            • pressanykeynow@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 day ago

              If Mullvad’s janitor were someone doing that and Mullvad refused to terminate them, I’d quit Mullvad.

              It’s Swedish company, there(and probably in most of the world) it’s illegal to fire someone for such reason, worker’s rights and all that.

              • chris@links.openriver.net
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 day ago

                Then I’d quit them….

                Don’t fund the guy funding the white nationalist party. That’s rule 1 and we can sort the rest out later.

                • pressanykeynow@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  How would you do it? There’s no way to “quit them” unless they want to quit themselves, it’s not the US. If you think you can fire them and pay some fines, that’s not the case, you’ll pay them fines AND will be required to rehire them. Like the only way is to shut down the whole company or make them a super sweet offer, both require giving them a lot of money.

            • grey_maniac@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              2 days ago

              Just to make sure I understand, you do support employer discrimination against employees, just only for the political beliefs you find offensive. Do I understand that correctly? While I believe the only good nazi is a dead one, I alao believe the systems we set up generate the crap we have to deal with later.

              • ZeroHora@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                20 hours ago

                In any sane country a “national socialist” aka nazi party is illegal, an employee funding a party like that are committing a crime so any morality bullshit about freeze peach is beyond that.

              • chris@links.openriver.net
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 day ago

                It’s Karl Popper’s tolerance paradox. To answer your question, yes I am in support of discrimination against anyone using their salary to fund over half the annual budget of a white nationalist political party.

                • LwL@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  I, for one, am in support of your ability to stop giving mullvad money as a consequence, but not in support of anyone being fired over a political donation regardless. I don’t want to be fired over donating to causes I support, and there is no universal moral judge to say what is fine to donate to, even if I have pretty strong opinions on the matter.

                  • chris@links.openriver.net
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    21 hours ago

                    I think we can find some lines though. We aren’t talking about political disagreements on the marginal tax rates or how to fund schools.

                    We are talking about donations to a political party calling for ethnic cleansing.

              • Vendetta9076@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 days ago

                The person you’re responding to is either speaking hyperbolically for Internet points or is actually too dumb to realize how stupid of a precedent that sets. Either way they aren’t worth engaging with.