• Gabadabs@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    1 day ago

    3 and 4 are genuinely the low point of the series and misinterpreted a lot from the original games. New Vegas was a lot closer to the original games. Yes, you can do heroic or terrible things, but I saw the franchise as very much an exploration of human nature during a time where people needed to scrounge and rebuild to survive. In the old games, resources are scarce and you have to make ethically gray choices. There’s not enough to go around, genuinely.

      • Gabadabs@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        14 hours ago

        And yet, New Vegas is widely considered the best of the 3D Fallout games. A more complex experience that makes you make tough decisions, that makes for a better RPG and a better story.

          • Gabadabs@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            13 hours ago

            I don’t think that’s really the case. New Vegas is constantly praised online, even on something like metacritic, which I take w/ a grain of salt generally, the user scores for NV are notably higher than 3 or 4.

            • ryathal@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              13 hours ago

              That’s generally how cult classics work. You see praise for The Big Lebowski because those that don’t like it mostly ignore it.