I swear to god those things are fucking HORRIBLE. They all feel fucking vibecoded and untested. Customer wanted some generative AI thing working, hired me, well pays the bills so I gotta do it, and the pip install ALONE already resulted in dependency problems and when I somehow resolved those, turns out that multiple packages are just missing. And when you ask someone, it’s like: “Uh it works for me” well thank you.
Just testing your fucking application before you toss it out in the wild is the least I expect from vibecoding retards.
I think the problem is, ironically, trying to use programmers for this. Not only are most of them opposed to vibe-coding out of principle; they work in ivory towers of pure math and can’t seem to wrap their heads around the real world and real users being random; they also have surprisingly little respect for deterministic behavior, statistics, reproducibility, controlled environments, ACID, CAP theorem, you name it, they just don’t give a shit as long as they can play with code.
Should use QA people instead. Their entire work revolves around getting reproducible results; they don’t mind what tools they use to get there; they’re not burdened by preconcieved dellusions of grandeur about knowing how to program; and they understand that the real world can be unpredictable.
Me trying to get LLM tools to work.
I swear to god those things are fucking HORRIBLE. They all feel fucking vibecoded and untested. Customer wanted some generative AI thing working, hired me, well pays the bills so I gotta do it, and the pip install ALONE already resulted in dependency problems and when I somehow resolved those, turns out that multiple packages are just missing. And when you ask someone, it’s like: “Uh it works for me” well thank you.
Just testing your fucking application before you toss it out in the wild is the least I expect from vibecoding retards.
Well, duh. LLM tools feel vibecoded. 🤯
I think the problem is, ironically, trying to use programmers for this. Not only are most of them opposed to vibe-coding out of principle; they work in ivory towers of pure math and can’t seem to wrap their heads around the real world and real users being random; they also have surprisingly little respect for deterministic behavior, statistics, reproducibility, controlled environments, ACID, CAP theorem, you name it, they just don’t give a shit as long as they can play with code.
Should use QA people instead. Their entire work revolves around getting reproducible results; they don’t mind what tools they use to get there; they’re not burdened by preconcieved dellusions of grandeur about knowing how to program; and they understand that the real world can be unpredictable.
Well there’s your first problem.
If customers want it, I gotta do it. Can’t force my beliefs and ethics on them or I’m not getting paid lmao.
https://youtu.be/C4MVQby0InQ
“I might be homeless and starved to death, but at least I didn’t work with LLMs!”
deleted by creator