slothrop @lemmy.ca to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days agothree cheers for fate!lemmy.caimagemessage-square90fedilinkarrow-up1646
arrow-up1646imagethree cheers for fate!lemmy.caslothrop @lemmy.ca to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square90fedilink
minus-squareMinnesotaGoddam@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·2 days agoNo it didn’t. Its best would have been to collapse above water
minus-squareCaptain Aggravated@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11·2 days agoNo, it’s best would have been to crush more rich people.
minus-squarelocahosr443@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up7·1 day agoStockton crush was such a failure, there was space for another 6-7 billionaires in that sub I reckon
minus-squareMinnesotaGoddam@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 day agoW why we could have built such a submarine, we could crush six or seven BILLION billionaires
minus-squareFoxtrotDeltaTango@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 day agoI agree with you on this lol
No it didn’t. Its best would have been to collapse above water
No, it’s best would have been to crush more rich people.
Stockton crush was such a failure, there was space for another 6-7 billionaires in that sub I reckon
W why we could have built such a submarine, we could crush six or seven BILLION billionaires
I agree with you on this lol