• FedX@quokk.au
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    189
    ·
    22 hours ago

    I guess they read the silmarillion, but understood not the words they read.

    • cavitationfetishist2@quokk.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      95
      ·
      edit-2
      22 hours ago

      They all do this. San francisco used to be the old hyperliterate drug fueled counterculture mecca. So they still identify with that, and there’s still like vestigial aesthetic shreds of the old city’s corpse hanging off their beloved Moloch (howl-written in San Francisco). So they see literary allusions and implying they’ve read books as cool. Especially the ones who came up in the 80s and 90s when the old literate hippies could still afford to live there.

      But none of them have read more than one book, because one is enough to reference, right? and they didn’t understand it. So mike zuckerberg read ‘snow crash’ and is just doing all the evil shit from ‘snow crash’. Thiel read LOTR. Whoever keeps giving money to ‘ai children’s toy’ read ‘diamond age’.

      Because they see is=aught and can’t tell the difference between fiction and reality on an emotional level, being shit heads who fundamentally disrespect the very concept of humanities and have no interiority.

        • cavitationfetishist2@quokk.au
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          7 hours ago

          Stephenson is pretty popular there. The shitheaded casually racist voerhoevenesque pithiness makes them feel smart and cool.

      • bampop@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        13 hours ago

        These people have an overwhelming predisposition to take a shit on everything. They encountered a thing. They took a shit on it.

        • MonkeMischief@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          6 hours ago

          Well yeah, they need to be the “alphas” and mark everything they like, especially cultural touchstones, as theirs.

          Otherwise, those things would be ours , and that’s Communism! (“Haven’t you read Animal Farm?!” They’ll screech, as they use 1984 as a roadmap.)

          They can’t imagine coexistence without zero-sum Thunderdome-esque competition over who gets to take and hold everything away from everyone else.

      • terranoid@lemmy.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        edit-2
        19 hours ago

        i think one thing people miss is that counter culture movements sometimes win people over in the worst ways and they get really extreme ideas, or really extreme people get spun up in them and become little evil vorticies of power and influence. The sixties spawned the civil rights movement, peace movement. It also created the Manson family. There’s a sort of yin and yang to these things IMO, creation and destruction. It’s like a period of high energy and change and that can get used in many creative and destructive ways.

        Some people see today as terrible and think socialism will fix it. Others, fascism. Two people agree that current leaders are failing, but for different reasons. And when everyone is demanding change, you can get some dangerous people to pop out of the wood work.

        People like Musk and Thiel grow up in free thinking environments and in counter culture meccas and are a direct result of that energy. They dont run counter to it. They are a product of it.

        • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          7 hours ago

          How did “the 60s” create the Manson family?

          We’ve had literally countless (often more) grisly and bizarre murders since Manson. No reason it should be any more notable.

          But I guess giving it some kind of mystical import helps you make an argument

          • UnspecificGravity@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 hours ago

            The idea that the entire country was on the razors edge of a “race ware” in which the “coloreds” were going to topple American society was very much a product of the media in the 1960s designed specifically to terrify the white folks into opposing the civil rights movement and was the founding principal of Manson’s entire plan.

        • cavitationfetishist2@quokk.au
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          edit-2
          17 hours ago

          There are complexities. Sure. Pushing new ideas is always complicated, and shitty people can do shitty things with them.

          The Manson family was hoover’s baby. Not that they’re innocent, but they had help sucking that much.

          None of that is this. The counter culture hasn’t been there for decades; what’s left is aesthetic remnants.

          Thiel grew up in a Nazi cult. I think in south Africa? There were swastikas on the flags in his school. Musk is from south africa-during apartheid. They’re not from fucking San Francisco. You’re trying to make a point about how too much freedom is bad sometimes. I’ve got complex feelings, but your point is totally unsupported by facts on display here.

          The point of what I said is that they’re not genuinely from/of there, its just the cultural milleiu they knew in their 20s. They pulled the fucking aesthetics and nothing else, and they’re getting stupid(er) because even the fucking aesthetics were too much for them.

      • Zarobi@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        17 hours ago

        They must think LOTR is an instruction manual in how to become an evil overlord or something

          • [object Object]@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            12 hours ago

            You know that Thiel explicitly sides with Sauron, as he himself has said in interviews? How would orcs be against him?

            • MonkeMischief@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              6 hours ago

              “Yeah but…I’d be a good Sauron.”

              “That sounds like where Boromir went wrong…”

              “Haha ‘Boromir’ huh? What’s their stock ticker? Maybe I can acquire them too…”

              • [object Object]@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                6 hours ago

                Nah, he straight up said that in Mordor shit worked, while outside it was all “wishy-washy and environmental” (direct quote). Too bad I haven’t saved the link.

                Of course, ‘environmental’ is an insult for someone like that bastard.

    • SippyCup@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      21 hours ago

      There’s a weird obsession among the far right lunatics with LOTR and just completely missing the message. Vance is in that crew too

      • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 hours ago

        They’ll miss the message of literally anything if it isn’t explicitly right wing.

        It must be intentional, at least for some of them, some of the time.

      • halcyoncmdr@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        30
        ·
        20 hours ago

        I’ve noticed the same in recent years with Star Trek and the far right as well.

        I don’t know how they can possibly miss that the Federation is functionally a post-scarcity socialist utopia.

        On the other hand… the Ferengi are essentially a direct replica of the modern US, including the far right’s clear motive to try and force women back to subservience. I’m sure they’d love to be able to force them to be naked all the time while they’re at it.

        It’s obvious many of the species in the ST universe were extreme caricatures of specific regions/countries from real life, and the Ferengi were based on the US… But I don’t think they expected the caricature to so directly become the reality.

        • Sturgist@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          11 hours ago

          I don’t know how they can possibly miss that the Federation is functionally a post-scarcity socialist utopia.

          Because there’s been a decades long effort to make American education really bad. There’s very little ability for critical thinking in that group of people.

        • Pope-King Joe@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          11 hours ago

          “NeW tReK iS wOkE”

          My guy, have you just been not paying attention for the last 60+ years? Star Trek has always been progressive.

        • MinnesotaGoddam@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          7 hours ago

          i wonder if the NuDiscoTrek time jump stuff was explicitly for the far right trekkers (yeah that’s right i said it with the hard R). First off, the writers shoved as much identity politics stuff in there because they didn’t want to do it. second off it was not the best trek we’ve had in a while, even though the actors tried. AND THEN THERE’S THE THIRD THING. i don’t know how we dealt with the third thing. fouthly one of trek’s main exports is corn. fifthly it might be why they got rid of all of the stuff that made trek trek like the postscarcity and the hair. lastly, and in conclusion, NuDiscoTrek is a land of contrast.

      • wopalopa@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        17 hours ago

        you can add warhammer 40k to it too.

        personally i would say its a sense of a belonging and purpose in a group for a unambigious cause that most people crave. but its just that most time the cause is skewed pretty bad by the people of power.

      • Strider@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Well somebody needs to be the villain.

        (as in: yes, that might also be the point. There are villains.)

        • MinnesotaGoddam@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          7 hours ago

          i used to live someplace where the village sobriquet ended in villain (as in Bostonville and the citizens were called Bostonvillains, although it was not as awkward because it was not a made up place like Bostonville) and i have to admit it’s pretty fun

    • halcyoncmdr@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      21 hours ago

      To be fair, can anyone understand The Silmarillion? The way it is written is hard even when you are literate.

        • MinnesotaGoddam@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          7 hours ago

          i used to study religion and it feels a lot like the begat section of the bible. i think that’s on purpose.

          like, some of the best stories are hidden in there, like the israelites eating so much divinely summoned magic ground bread that they got so sick of it that they complained to their god for divinely summoned meat. and back then their god was not sick to their heart of humans yet so they gave the israelites meat. they gave the israelites so much meat they ate so much they vomited it so violently it came out they noses, according to the bible. no i did not make that imagery up myself. i had the Great Gay King James’s Interpreters’ help. yeah that’s why they stopped using KJV. it was too gay.

          • UnspecificGravity@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            5 hours ago

            There is a reason that Tolkein did not publish the Silmarillion. It’s not a book. It is his own musings on the origins and backstory of the universe he created. It was likely used simply as an exercise to develop his work with no intention of it ever actually being a published work in its own right.

        • FedX@quokk.au
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          20 hours ago

          This is a very apt description of it. I remember the creation of Arda, but beyond that, it’s all a bit fuzzy, like I read the Wikipedia page half asleep and dreamed the rest.

          • Godric@lemmy.worldOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            16 hours ago

            You sure you didn’t read the creation of Arda and then fall asleep fully? I did, It’s the worst chapters of the Silmarillion that filters 90% of the readers, the reason I reccomend all readers start with the coming of the Elves.

      • arctanthrope@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        19 hours ago

        when reading The Silmarillion, it’s important to remember that Finrod, the brother of Galadriel, is different from Fingon. Fingon is Finrod’s cousin, and also the brother of Turgon. Fingon and Turgon’s father is Fingolfin, who is the brother of Finarfin, who is Finrod’s father. you’ll have a hard time following the story if you don’t keep all those straight

    • Godric@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      22 hours ago

      They probably saw The Oath as just badass, and the First Kinslaying as a “gotta break a few eggs to make an omlette” inspiration