If you did the work they requested, isn’t the cost of renaming the bands kind of their problem and not yours? This you should still get paid for the work you did.
Written contacts aren’t the most binding forms. Prior behavior and how other people are treated is more binding. If 10 people sign a contract, and it’s only enforced on one person, the written contact isn’t binding.
If you did the work they requested, isn’t the cost of renaming the bands kind of their problem and not yours? This you should still get paid for the work you did.
I assume there is no written contract and if, would you be willing to sour the relationship?
Definitely leaves a bad taste.
Flip the question, would the person that made the name change be willing to sour the relationship? Kind of sound like they are.
Just because there was nothing in writing does not mean there was no contract, it just makes it harder to sue.
Written contacts aren’t the most binding forms. Prior behavior and how other people are treated is more binding. If 10 people sign a contract, and it’s only enforced on one person, the written contact isn’t binding.