• misk@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      The list was not public, what are you going on about?

      Tesseract is open source, no?

      He was also not ‘running’ anything for most users, any more than Linus is ‘running’ my pc just because I’m using Linux.

      He is running an opinionated client to the underlying ActivityPub network. He states that in user agreement and docs for admins that want to host it on their own.

      Do I agree with a design philosophy intended to decrease polarisation? Heck yeah. The amount of downvotes I’ve got shows what kind of people this thing attracts. Reeks of reddit.

      • AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        Are you at all aware of the actual details of this incident?

        Tesseract is open source, no?

        It was an intentionally obfuscated line of code that pulled a file direct from his server. A file that was intentionally not in the repo so they nobody would know about it. In IT, we call that malware.

        • misk@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          How else could such list work? New Tesseract release for every update to the filter? It wasn’t encrypted.

          • AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            3 days ago

            To begin with: Apps using such lists make it very clear upfront what they are doing. NOBODY OBFUSCATES THE VERY EXISTENCE OF THE LIST.

            The list can also easily be a part of the repo that’s pulled at runtime. Or viewable and modifiable from within the app itself.

            It wasn’t encrypted.

            It’s a client side app, by definition there’s no easy way to encrypt it. Dude certainly gave it a shot by base-64 encoding it. There was no technical reason to encode a text file.

            • misk@piefed.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              3 days ago

              It was disclosed through user agreement and docs for admins hosting Tesseract. List wasn’t encrypted. We’re going in circles now.

              People are allowed to have political opinions and they’re allowed to express them through software. Don’t like it? Don’t use it.