ickplant@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 1 day agoPervert cancerlemmy.worldimagemessage-square107fedilinkarrow-up1334
arrow-up1334imagePervert cancerlemmy.worldickplant@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 1 day agomessage-square107fedilink
minus-squareAscendantSquid@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·1 day agoIt’s not the point at all, but can dogs be poor? Like, their human can be poor, but does that then apply to the dog too? Applying a financial status to a dog feels weird, it’s not like it can open a bank account.
minus-squareTm12@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·1 day agoMaybe dogs can’t be wealthy, but some eat/live really well.
minus-squareMinnesotaGoddam@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·21 hours agoa lot of people’s pets eat better than they do
minus-squaresp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 day agoI mean strictly speaking, yes, it is odd to describe a dog directly with human socioeconomic descriptors. But yeah, I meant it as ‘the dog is owned by a poor human’.
It’s not the point at all, but can dogs be poor? Like, their human can be poor, but does that then apply to the dog too? Applying a financial status to a dog feels weird, it’s not like it can open a bank account.
Maybe dogs can’t be wealthy, but some eat/live really well.
a lot of people’s pets eat better than they do
I mean strictly speaking, yes, it is odd to describe a dog directly with human socioeconomic descriptors.
But yeah, I meant it as ‘the dog is owned by a poor human’.