Jorunn (she/her)@piefed.blahaj.zoneM to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · il y a 1 moisWhat some call a "call to violence" probably. also rulefiles.catbox.moeimagemessage-square87fedilinkarrow-up1745 cross-posted to: leftymemes@lemmy.dbzer0.commop@quokk.au
arrow-up1745imageWhat some call a "call to violence" probably. also rulefiles.catbox.moeJorunn (she/her)@piefed.blahaj.zoneM to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · il y a 1 moismessage-square87fedilink cross-posted to: leftymemes@lemmy.dbzer0.commop@quokk.au
minus-squareflandish@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·il y a 30 jourssure. yes, it’s violence because fists hit things. sure. i am saying that specifically in relation to nazis, the value of self defense makes the “violence” no longer violence when it’s used as self defense.
minus-squarewerty@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·il y a 29 joursIt’s still violence and you are being ridiculous. You can say that violence against nazis is ok, you don’t need to pretend.
minus-squareflandish@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·il y a 29 joursi reckon i am being a little thick. my apologies. :)
sure. yes, it’s violence because fists hit things. sure. i am saying that specifically in relation to nazis, the value of self defense makes the “violence” no longer violence when it’s used as self defense.
It’s still violence and you are being ridiculous. You can say that violence against nazis is ok, you don’t need to pretend.
i reckon i am being a little thick. my apologies. :)