• mabeledo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 days ago

    Neither does systemd. They are optional.

    LDAP has had a birth date field for like 20 years now. Is it “complicit” as well?

    • Viceversa@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Neither does systemd. They are optional.

      Fields are optional, but developers of systemd consciously preimplemented those fields.

      And in a DB that’s not the case.

      • mabeledo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        systemd devs successfully rage baited you and a bunch of others. It’s time to let it go.

        But if you don’t want to, let me ask, how do you think a data field with no connection to any access control subsystem, is going to prevent anyone from logging in?

          • anyhow2503@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            2 days ago

            It isn’t. I’m pretty sure the dev working on that userdb field didn’t plan on getting death threats on github and said as much afterwards.