- cross-posted to:
- privacy@programming.dev
- cross-posted to:
- privacy@programming.dev
theguardian.com/us-news/2026/jul/23/cop-city-protester-phone
consumerrights.wiki/w/Common_Questions,Arguments,&_Responses_when_discussing_Flock_Surveillance
theguardian.com/us-news/2026/jul/23/cop-city-protester-phone
consumerrights.wiki/w/Common_Questions,Arguments,&_Responses_when_discussing_Flock_Surveillance
No. They can’t charge him with data destruction because it was the officer that destroyed the data.
You’re right, they will not be able to charge him with anything. This is an excellent case to set a precedent that this tech is totally legal.
That’s not correct, according to the first sentence of the article from 404.