• erebion@news.erebion.eu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    edit-2
    17 hours ago

    Also, no mainline kernel support. Pretty sure it’d be easy to do for Jolla (even I manage to do some mainlining work and I don’t sell phones).

    This means it’ll be a security nightmare at some point, just like any other phone.

    Plus the specific app format. You cannot install the many nice GNOME apps, KDE apps and others that already exist.

    I do have a SailfishOS phone for testing, but to make it even a bit useful I’d have to use AppSupport, which is Android in a container with a proprietary wrapper. There are barely any apps, they should leverage the power of the many mobile Linux apps that exist. I’d rather have some apps with a UI that looks different to the rest than not having what I need.

    • Default Username@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      17 hours ago

      This is what really makes it a non-starter for me. Also, if there was a mainline kernel, I could just install any other distro I want instead.

      I’m still waiting for a somewhat modern phone with a fully functional mainline kernel.

    • Lojcs@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      13 hours ago

      The app format lock in sounds crazy to me. How does it stop you from running other apps? Does it not have a terminal? Does it not give you sudo? Does it refuse to run any executables, or is it about the ui toolkit?

      Sorry for the barrage, that sounded outrageous

      • erebion@news.erebion.eu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        13 hours ago

        They just have their own format using their owm SailfishOS-specific UI libraries. Their apps don’t work elsewhere without patching, there’s no Flatpak and they only have SailfishOS apps in the repo.

        Sure, you can write your own apps, but I prefer using what’s already there.