• DeLancre@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Music services still pretty useful. I’m using deezer for example, it can stream lossless audio and kinda okay with “radio” mode. Used spotify before, but it infuriated me by suggesting same music I already heard for 20-50 times. It’s like at some point it just traps you in your own bubble of 100-200 songs.

      The alternative would be downloading thousands of albums in flac and uploading to multiple devices. Plus you need to add new music, which includes searching for that mentioned music. So yeah, nah, I’m okay with paying subscription for now. Until they eventually go to shit like video services did. Then we will need to come up with “popcorn time” alternative for music I guess.

      • SoakedBread@multiverse.soulism.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        12 hours ago

        I still sticking with Qobuz. 70% of the time I listen to music I try to discover new artists and find obscure stuff. It would be way to time consuming to download random stuff via. Soulseek in hope to find a single track I like. So the discoverability of streaming services is unbeaten. If I like an Artist, I either download the tracks on Soulseek (Which is pain in the ass in my opinion) or I buy it via. bandcamp to add the to my offline collection.

        • JigglySackles@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          9 hours ago

          Man I have zero issues with Soulseek. I’ve gotten so much stuff from there. Even obscure. What struggles do you have with it?

          • SoakedBread@multiverse.soulism.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            9 hours ago

            If I am searching for something I mostly will find it, but only 1/4 of my downloads complete. Most of the time the downloads stuck at the status “queued” and won’t download. I have to find at least 4 different sources to get the Track I want. I’m using Nicotine+.

            • JigglySackles@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              6 hours ago

              Are you sharing too? Most people on there autoblock transfers if the DLer isn’t sharing.

              I haven’t used Nicotine+ so I can’t be sure there isn’t something with that. I just use the soulseekQt client.

              • SoakedBread@multiverse.soulism.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                5 hours ago

                Yes. Always. About 60Gb. Maybe it’s the Client but I don’t think this will solve the problem but I will try soulseekQt.

                Edit: Wow. I think this was the solution! With the OG Soulseek Client every request is downloading within seconds! The Client looks a little bit out of date, but if it works, I don’t mind. Surprisingly I get some bot messages every few request to prove I’m human. I never got these kind of messages with Nicotine+. Thank you very much!

      • lyralycan@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        13 hours ago

        I’m downloading thousands of albums now in a bid to archive and run my own streaming service and let me tell you, I probably won’t ever unsubscribe from Tidal.

        • DeLancre@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          12 hours ago

          Not everyone have static IP and device that can work as server. But yeah, it’s not like you can’t find work around: something like old android phone or spare notebook with pinggy on top would do the trick. Still, point stands - as for now it’s less convenient option.

          • Axolotl@feddit.it
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            11 hours ago

            Not everyone have static IP

            You can use a DDNS

            and device that can work as server

            Yep, if you don’t have any hardware or money that sucks, the hardware costs a lot, what i could buy with 20-30€ costs over the hundreds

            • DeLancre@piefed.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              10 hours ago

              what i could buy with 20-30€ costs over the hundreds

              Khm-khm, arm boards, khm-khm

              No like, for real, why 16gb arm board like O6 now costs almost 1k euro? 32gb version right now 1400 euro on aliexpress. FOR WHAT? Finest chinesium?

              And “affordable” Raspberry Pi with as much ram as my toaster (and similar CPU at that) now costs more money, than regular small mini PC on x86.

              You can use a DDNS

              I need to dig into that a bit more, but I’m not sure if it will work with NAT on ISP side (with is a common thing at least in region I’m from).

              • Axolotl@feddit.it
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                10 hours ago

                Khm-khm, arm boards, khm-khm

                Even x86 hardware, because everyone is now selling shit without RAM and SSD/HDDs but with the same prices

                I need to dig into that a bit more, but I’m not sure if it will work with NAT on ISP side (with is a common thing at least in region I’m from).

                It should work in theory