• BurgerBaron@quokk.au
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 days ago

    They’ve done a lot of vowing and promising and announcing future changes lately.

    How about shut up, Microsoft, and let the changelogs speak for themselves?

  • juipeltje@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    2 days ago

    Even if they actually pull it off, shouldn’t we want to optimize regardless of any shortages?

    • trem@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 days ago

      For the end users, yeah, it would be a fairly high priority. But Microsoft doesn’t have to pay for your hardware, so unless it’s genuinely a problem that loses them lots of customers, they don’t care.

    • tal@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      Well, optimization takes dev time. You can use dev time for other things too — debugging, improving performance on systems with enough memory, adding features, improving security. Or not use the dev time and cost less. So it’s a tradeoff.

  • redlemace@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    3 days ago

    Linux:

    
                   total        used        free      shared  buff/cache   available
    Mem:            13Gi       2.5Gi         9Gi       816Mi       2.2Gi        11Gi
    Swap:          4.0Gi          0B       4.0Gi