• T156@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      12 minutes ago

      That’s a bad idea. You don’t want to get a stranger, or yourself in the eye.

      Anything that would do meaningful damage to a camera sensor will easily to that to human eyeballs if it refracts or gets reflected.

      Especially for cheaper high-power lasers, which may not properly filter out invisible wavelengths.

    • NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      Spray paint poles are cheaper and safer. Tungsten carbide sawzall blades aren’t that expensive either

    • Malyca@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 hours ago

      You’d need a laser powerful enough and those are hard to get. Those are super dangerous I’d recommend people stay away from them if they don’t know about how they work.

      • Zak@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Absolutely. 500mW+ lasers can injure human eyes in a fraction of a second, even from a reflection, similar to how they can destroy a camera sensor.

        They’re not particularly hard to get online in the USA though.

  • soratoyuki@piefed.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    3 hours ago

    The police have been yelling for years that fighting crime is just an unwanted side effect of their actual jobs; protecting capital and killing brown people.

    One of these days we should believe them.

  • Ex Nummis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    ·
    7 hours ago

    That was never the objective in the first place. Blanket surveillance and getting people used to the idea of zero privacy, ever again.

    • FauxLiving@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      7 hours ago

      “Under observation, we act less free, which means we effectively are less free.”

      -Edward Snowden

  • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    53
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Just like most AI, it makes the user lazier. And I’m someone who is forced to use AI for work and I can confirm.

    Why would police actively try to solve a crime when they could lean on flock? Even if it gets it wrong they can say they tried and then move on.