I get it, local papers are struggling to survive and ad revenue is down. And there is a note on the page to identify that it is “sponsored content.” But at first glance it’s visually indistinguishable from any other story or op-ed the paper publishes. This is misleading to casual readers.

For context, there is an ongoing multi-decade legal fight to get the government to remove four large dams on the Snake River in the northwest US. The paid content here is written by a consortium representing organizations which have financial incentives to keep the dams in place.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Snake_River#Proposed_dam_removal

  • FriendOfDeSoto@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    20 hours ago

    I kind of expect this sort of hidden ad shenanigans these days. Which I shouldn’t, of course. But as a result I find it more infuriating to have a link to the “article” next to the already opened very same “article.” Come on, algorithm! That’s just unforgivable.