Sixty minutes. That’s how long it took for a private Snapchat message to travel from Kristen Volpe’s phone to the FBI to the deputies standing in her elementary school hallway. On January 29, 2025, the 22-year-old student teacher at John L. Hensey Elementary in Washington, Illinois, vented to her boyfriend and two roommates — three people total — after a student closed her laptop mid-class and wiped her lesson plan. She referenced shooting the student or the school. She meant it as a frustrated joke. Snapchat’s algorithm didn’t get the humor.

No student reported her. No parent. No coworker. The flag was entirely automated. Snapchat’s policy permits voluntary emergency disclosures to law enforcement — no warrant required — when the platform determines imminent harm exists. The algorithm makes that initial call. Think of it like your Ring doorbell deciding to call 911 on its own, except the doorbell is reading your text messages.

  • Atomic@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 hour ago

    You don’t know they spied on electronic communication during WW2? That’s why it’s called wire-tap… you’d literally tap into the wire and read the signal

    • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      60 minutes ago

      Go back another 20ish years and we were still tapping electronic comms, the Zimmerman Telegram was WW1

    • nyan@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Not quite the same thing, because back then, each wire had to be listened to by a human being in order to see if there was anything actionable passing along it, making surveillance a scarce resource that had to be deployed selectively. Now we have machines listening for keywords on all communications passing through a system, and the resource is no longer scarce: they can listen to everyone, and do.

      Unfortunately, people’s expectations are still stuck in the phone-tap era.