• hakase@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    9 hours ago

    The whole “I’m just innocently asking questions” schtick clearly isn’t working in this thread. You’ll get 'em next time though (as long as you post in womensstuff where nobody will call you out on it, of course!)

      • hakase@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        9 hours ago

        Your comments are a very finely polished lens that lends itself well to accurate and detailed projection.

        • velma@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          9 hours ago

          Mhm sure. A person’s social media is a perfect representation of them and you know exactly how I’ll respond to any situation now.

          • hakase@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            9 hours ago

            Please prove me wrong. I mean that sincerely. Please establish such a consistent record of not demonizing men in your comments that I no longer feel as though I can confidently ascribe malice to them.

            • velma@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              9 hours ago

              Quote me.

              Pull quotes from my comments that demonize men. And not just some men, but all men. Show me what you mean.

              • hakase@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                9 hours ago

                That’s moving the goalposts. The entire point of my initial comment in this thread is that you’ve unfairly demonized OP specifically. Would you like me to find examples of you demonizing individuals in the past for similar imagined transgressions, all of which just happen to point in a single direction?

                (Keeping in mind, of course, that you’re demonizing them for a single post title when you’re so ardently objecting to being misconstrued for “a single comment” here.)

                • velma@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  9 hours ago

                  You claimed that I comment about this topic so frequently that you can ascertain what I meant by my initial comment.

                  If that’s the truth, it should be easy to pull a few comments to show what you mean.

                  • hakase@lemmy.zip
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    9 hours ago

                    That’s true - you comment so frequently calling individuals out for imagined misogyny (and, notably, never calling them out for imagined misandry), that it’s easy to ascertain what you meant by your original comment.

                    If you’d like me to find similar examples of you doing the same thing you did in this thread, let me know and I’ll do so when I’m on my desktop next - it’s too cumbersome to go through your comment history on my phone.