• velma@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    How convenient.

    You get to lob accusations at me, claim you have evidence, and then bow out hours later without producing any of it.

    Misandry doesn’t exist the same way misogyny does. I’ll stand by those words from here until death.

    • hakase@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      I never said that it was, and you know that isn’t what I’ve been talking about this whole time, though your dogged determination to pretend otherwise isn’t lost on me.

      If you’re still actually trying to defend saying “Thank you!” to a comment literally saying “Misandry doesn’t exist”, then we’re both wasting our time here.

      • velma@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        I thanked them for clarifying what they meant with their comment.

        The comment you have the most issues with so far is this one:

        Misandry isn’t the reverse of misogyny. There’s no anti-men power structures being kept in place by women, there isn’t women-dominated governments stripping men of their rights, there’s no systemic violence against men perpetuated by women in power.

        There are certainly individuals that hate men, but misandry simply doesn’t exist the same way misogyny does.

        I stand by it. But by all means, since there’s supposedly “literally hundreds” of comments where I am demonizing all men and being blatantly misandrist, please show everyone.

        • hakase@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Again making up strawmen to fight. You’re clearly continuing to intentionally misunderstand me, so I don’t think there’s much more I can say here.