• gramie@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    3 months ago

    Those certainly were appalling and destructive events. But why give them some special status over other bombing raids like the March 9 fire bombing of Tokyo, which also killed over 100,000 people in one night? Dropping 1 bomb vs. dropping 1,600 tons of conventional bombs in 3 hours?

    • certified sinonist@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      200k people were vaporized by atomic bombs in an utterly indiscriminate manner. This is inclusive of babies, little infants literally melted in a second. The radiation persisted decades after the blast.

      We give it a special status despite conventional warfare still being capable of greater numbers, because of how exceedingly cruel and indiscriminate it is.

      Historians described it as an ‘ethical shock’ and I agree with the term. If the yanks did not elect to exclusively melt civilians with their demonstration history might look at it differently.

    • Theoriginalthon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Exactly you have to look at it objectively. It’s like the trolley problem bomb 2 cities killing ~240k people almost instantly or continue fire bombing and launching a land invasion for another year or 2 potentially killing millions.

      Would I want to make that decision, fuck no.