Gintoki@lemmy.zip to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 2 天前Always when i'm busylemmy.zipexternal-linkmessage-square17fedilinkarrow-up1235
arrow-up1235external-linkAlways when i'm busylemmy.zipGintoki@lemmy.zip to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 2 天前message-square17fedilink
minus-squaresafesyrup@feddit.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up2·2 天前No, not the bowl itself but the tank that flushes the bowl.
minus-squareGrail@multiverse.soulism.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 天前You empty the whole cistern just for a piss?
minus-squaresafesyrup@feddit.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 天前My toilet flushing mechanism only works in a boolean fashion: either no water or the whole flush. There is an option for large and small flush though, so likely it does not use the whole canister, but still.
minus-squareGrail@multiverse.soulism.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 天前Here in Australia, dual flush has been the law for decades
minus-squaresafesyrup@feddit.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 天前I get it, my toilet also has dual flush. Even if the small buttpn is only 3L, it is still not worth it to flush 0.3L of piss with it.
minus-squareboonhet@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·14 小时前It’s actually good for your drainage system to flush more often than strictly necessary. And the public sewer system actually.
No, not the bowl itself but the tank that flushes the bowl.
You empty the whole cistern just for a piss?
My toilet flushing mechanism only works in a boolean fashion: either no water or the whole flush. There is an option for large and small flush though, so likely it does not use the whole canister, but still.
Here in Australia, dual flush has been the law for decades
I get it, my toilet also has dual flush. Even if the small buttpn is only 3L, it is still not worth it to flush 0.3L of piss with it.
It’s actually good for your drainage system to flush more often than strictly necessary. And the public sewer system actually.