Federal mission agencies, including the Centers for Disease Control and PreventionDepartment of EnergyEnvironmental Protection AgencyNational Institute of Standards and TechnologyNational Oceanic and Atmospheric AdministrationU.S. Department of Agriculture and U.S. Geological Survey, play different but equally important roles. They conduct and support science that informs decisions affecting public health, environmental protection, energy security, economic development and public safety. Many of these activities generate public benefits that market forces alone are unlikely to adequately provide.

Scientific leadership depends on people, institutions, infrastructure and knowledge. These assets accumulate slowly over decades but can be weakened surprisingly quickly.

The current debate is not merely theoretical. Funding reductionsworkforce losses and disruptions affecting universities and federal agencies are already reshaping parts of the American research enterprise.

  • supersquirrel@sopuli.xyzOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    At the same time, the report arrives after a series of Trump administration policy actions that have already begun reshaping universities, federal agencies and federal research funding. The debate is therefore not simply about a future vision. It is also about how current policy changes may reshape the American research enterprise for decades to come.

    clicks link

    How is this not just a slap in the face to the reader?

    • mycodesucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      4 days ago

      Don’t worry… The “alternative facts” are completely free because they’re funded by think tanks and billionaires. And there’re no negative consequences whatsoever.