• tburkhol@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    5 hours ago

    50 TB isn’t even that much space, certainly not for a broadcaster. No reason not to have a local copy. 50 PB, I could see a small PBS affiliate not having the resources to manage locally, but you can put 50 TB in consumer-grade NAS.

    • BassTurd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      4 hours ago

      That’s less storage than my Plex storage. PBS could and should definitely do better.

      • Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 hours ago

        More specifically, this PBS affiliate (Nine PBS St Louis). It wasn’t PBS proper. This only impacted local programming archives. But that’s still a loss for the local community.

        PBS likely does much better than this. Heck, a lot of their stuff is backed up in the Library of Congress.

        • ignominous_wombat@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          15 minutes ago

          Either way, like under $2000 would have bought them the storage necessary to keep these backups on-site. They still would’ve needed another backup solution for redundancy purposes, but this wouldn’t be the huge issue it seems to be now, where the data is sort of in limbo.