• unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      21 hours ago

      Completely unusable for normal human beings. I use it in combination with yt-dlp and for that it’s nice but as a general purpose media player it’s awful. No graphical interface or settings that are usable without a wiki.

      • Lojcs@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        48 minutes ago

        Is the pseudo gui not enough? And it explains pretty much everything I’d need when ‘H’ is pressed.

        The way I see it you’re either a non-techie that’ll be fine with the on screen controls, or you’re a techie and will discover the various shortcuts yourself or by making a web search.

      • dry_water@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        20 hours ago

        Not really, MPC-QT is a pretty good graphical interface that I’d say is “comparable” with VLC? https://mpv.rocks/ has some decent setup write ups on setting up mpv on windows and linux both.

      • curbstickle@anarchist.nexus
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        20 hours ago

        libmpv is used in a wide variety of user friendly players.

        When people say “use mpv”, its like “use Linux”. Generally speaking you aren’t doing much with the Linux kernel, you need the rest of the tools around it to make it friendly.

        No difference here - grab one of the many players that use mpv under the hood. mpv.net, smplayer, iina, moonplayer, haruna, mpvex, etc, etc.

      • Aibo1@ani.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        20 hours ago

        That is fair. Use it daily on Linux because its so customizable and powerful, but not a plug n play solution.