• CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    10 hours ago

    The downside there is that if it’s, like, Marmite, you’ll never ever eat 100g in one sitting. So, you have to do a bunch of math to figure out how much salt is in the actual smear you’re using.

    • jnod4@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      9 hours ago

      We do have both on packages, per 100g and per serving, but we don’t have anything wich is a nanogram per serving containing a couple billion servings in a bottle unless it’s anti matter

    • J92@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Its at least more accurate than the maths of trying to multiply by the purported zero on a can of avocado oil.

      • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        9 hours ago

        Yes. They should require a certain number of significant digits, as opposed to just the nearest integer. Although someone’s saying that they actually let you round down from as many as 5 to 0, which is insane if true.

        • andros_rex@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 hours ago

          Iirc they let you say something has 0 grams of trans fat if it’s less than 5 grams per serving.