• Aganim@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    1 day ago

    Because putting QoL improvements and having an effective workflow behind a bunch of plugins that break on the tiniest Gnome update is all part of the user experience I guess. I’ve given it several tries over the past 20 years or so, but each attempt eventually ended in utter disappointment.

    • disorderly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 day ago

      I don’t believe you. Gnome 2 was pretty much universally loved (hence the existence of Cinnamon, which is a direct descendant), and people were pissed about the tablet-oriented Gnome 3. You’d know this if you used Gnome 20 years ago.

      • Bluewing@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 hours ago

        As KDE user, Gnome 2 was the best Gnome has ever been, (Cinnamon is a good offspring of it though). I used the carp out of it. I cried and drank myself to sleep for days after Gnome 3 replaced it.

        I have even bigger hopes for COSMIC. If DE any can run a black sword through Gnome 3, it will be COSMIC.

      • Aganim@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 day ago

        Well, my apologies for misremembering the exact Gnome 3 launch date. Turns out that was 15 years ago instead of 20. You caught me red-handed sir.

      • jdr@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        I used gnome then, when Ubuntu would send you free CDs and GNOME was poo-flavoured. It was harder to set things up then, and I kind of see why people gave up and used some hack of the windowing kit from GIMP. Much has happened it 20 years though. KDE got worse (imho, but we have Trinity), GNOME stayed worse, and Linux became easy and mainstream.