• Pudutr0n@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Ah yes, the hubris of man. Cause we can totally prove logic works without using logic, right?

    • the_q@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Which is more logical: some supernatural, indefinable thing or cold finality?

      You can’t prove either, but one is foundational to shared delusions that drives commerce, hatred and war while the other is just peace.

        • the_q@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          7 hours ago

          Explain how it’s a deity. I don’t worship it. It doesn’t give me purpose. It’s not a comfort.

          • JcbAzPx@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 hours ago

            the other is just peace.

            That sounds a lot like you consider it a comfort.

            Nothing isn’t peace, it’s nothing.

          • Pudutr0n@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            7 hours ago

            You pushed the inexplicable, the black box, into a system. Deities/the unknown forces come in all kinds of shapes and formats, not only judeochristian / abrahamic. Maybe it’s not a deity, but it’s where the magic we can’t explain happens. We need axioms for anything, dude. I’m not anti-science, I just think all belief and knowledge is necessarily based in things that cannot be proven… and that’s ok.