• Cypress@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 hours ago

    I’ve been leaving behind a few more dead timelines than usual lately. deja-vu-like flashes of mistakes I’m concurrently avoiding AND making at once. tripping down stairs that i actually made it safely to the bottom of. catastrophic car accidents that everyone actually ends up driving away from unscathed. I see it flash before my eyes and divert my course… I try to tell myself it’s just experiential pattern recognition providing examples of what could go wrong, why to be cautious and take care. But… Yeah, this hits freaky

  • curiousaur@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 hours ago

    This is too real, I absolutely ate it once in a hotel shower all alone. I was stunned and had the wind knocked out of me while getting waterboarded by the shower. I don’t think I ever felt so helpless and actually started thinking this is how it ends.

  • voodooattack@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    5 hours ago

    Ok, but hear me out. What if the universe is the insides of a quantum computation doing a Levin search based on reversible computation? Aka every time you truly hesitate before making a decision you’re doing a quick-save?

    Edit: oh, and it’d be lazily evaluated in this case

  • laranis@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Crawling around a claustrophobic attic in a heatwave recently and I had a panicked moment where I decided I had better get out before hyperthermia made it so I physically couldn’t.

    Pretty sure there is a parallel universe where firefighters are cutting holes in the ceiling to extract my rotting corpse from behind an aging air handler.

  • takeda@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    4 hours ago

    It isn’t always binary (dead vs alive) you are more likely to slip, fall and become disabled. How does that fit the quantum immortality?

    • Saledovil@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 hours ago

      As JcbAzPx said, you’ll continue in all timelines where you’re alive. No matter of how injured you are. Eventually, you’ll be just a brain kept alive through thermal fluctuation. (Theoretically, entropy can spontaneously go down, the chances of this happening going down exponentially the more entropy we’re talking about. Think about shuffling a deck of cards, and getting a completely sorted deck of cards. Certain at 1 card, 25% chance at 2 cards, and basically zero at a full deck, but still theoretically possible.) Eventually, you’ll be a disembodied brain suffering for all eternity from phantom pain.

      • JoeBigelow@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 hours ago

        My dude, you are just a cloud of random particles interacting in space whose unpredictable fluctuations have resulted in a structure exactly mimicking a human brain, complete with memories and knowledge of “the universe”

    • JcbAzPx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 hours ago

      You continue in any time lines you’re still alive in. Even if you don’t want to be.

    • Saledovil@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 hours ago

      As far as I know, there’s no evidence of the many-worlds interpretation, which quantum immortality relies on.

      Also, quantum immortality doesn’t mean you can’t die, it means you’ll go to hell when you do. Eventually you’ll be reduced to a state where you can only think, with no way to interact with, or senses the world at all, making you dead for any observer who is not you. And you’ll stay in this state forever.

        • Saledovil@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 hours ago

          I was sort of still thinking of this quantum hell thought experiment, and wanted to write about it. I should probably have started my comment with “I believe the interpretation presented in OP’s post to be false because …”

  • Björn@swg-empire.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    9 hours ago

    I sometimes think about this playing video games, especially Tomb Raider. The protagonist never ever failed. From their perspective they must feel invincible. Kind of explains Lara’s cocky attitude.

    • Nalivai@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Game idea: narrative focused crpg, with a relatively straightforward plot, but the protagonist remembers every time you reload and his every death, progressively tries to figure out what’s happening, all while trying to actually succeed the original plot because that also seems important.

      • Wirlocke@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        2 hours ago

        Undertale is this but it’s not focused on too heavily unless you play multiple routes.

        Deltarune I think (I haven’t played it myself) has this kind of plot with the protagonist having an antagonist relationship to the player controlling them, but it’s more focused on player-made choices instead of save mechanics.

        I would also like to nominate In Stars and Time, which is about timeloops and is very meta but not in the fourth wall breaking way.

        • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          7 hours ago

          I hear good things about it, but am not particularly one for horror, still considering picking it up at some point though

          • GratefullyGodless@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            It is horror, but it’s also not horror. StP brings so much more than just horror, it has comedic moments, romantic moments, thoughtful moments, and plenty of WTF moments. And, how it all plays out depends on what you choose.

            Steam has a two hour return policy, so I would recommend getting the game, and trying out the opening to see what you think. It’s not for everyone, but if you’re the type who likes to think deep thoughts about the universe like OP posted, then you’ll probably enjoy this game.

            • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 hour ago

              So more the kind of horror that Gothic is (thinky horror) than the more visceral type? Because I actually love the more Gothic horror that’s more about making you sad than scared (like Frankenstein), I just hate the feeling of jumping at shadows after a scary movie/game

      • JcbAzPx@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Not a game, but I remember a choose your own adventure style video series on YouTube where if you choose some early bad ends, the main character will start acting more and more reluctant to follow your choices.

    • Zephyr@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      9 hours ago

      The universe seems to be as far as we know now physically infinite and homogeneous. That means all possible arrangements of matter exits. In any direction you can point there would be an atom for atom copy of the earth and it’s entire history including a copy ofe writing this comment as well as all others permutations. There’s no need for jumping to new universes at all depending on the nature of consciousness.

      • tetris11@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 hours ago

        CMBR isn’t homogenous though within our bubble, how can we assume the universe beyond our horizon is the same. We are but fish in a pond

      • EnchiladaRaisins@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 hours ago

        That depends on whether or not there was an infinite amount of energy in the Big Bang. Lacking that, you can’t have infinite matter (i.e. infinite copies and possible configurations) even if you have infinite space to put it in.

        • Wirlocke@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 hours ago

          When current theories say the universe is infinite they also mean an even distribution of matter in that infinite space.

          And for something like the big bang, when theories say that the universe originated from a singularity they actually mean the infinite sized universe had infinite density at one instance, not that it literally came from one single point.

          So there is technically infinite energy in the universe, but all that infinite energy is still experiencing entropy at on average the same rate.

        • Zephyr@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Imagine you have three coils, there’s only so many ways you can arrange them in a line. It’s essentially that idea but for matter

      • TranscendentalEmpire@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        8 hours ago

        The universe seems to be as far as we know now physically infinite and homogeneous. That means all possible arrangements of matter exits.

        There’s a couple assumptions being made here that allow for this hypothesis to be possible. We do not know if the universe is actually infinite, it’s just a possibility based on what we can currently observe (around 93 billion light years). Even if something is incalculably large, it’s still miniscule compared to the infinite that this hypothesis requires.

        Secondly the universe is only homogeneous at a very large scale. The universe at a local scale is very diverse in its make-up, it’s only homogeneous at a scale of hundreds of millions of light years.

        If we disregard these assumptions is it possible that there are near copies of our perceived realities in other places in the universe, maybe…but is it likely?

        • Zephyr@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          8 hours ago

          Most definitely. It’s assuming our current understanding is accurate, spacetime is flat and the universe is at a large scale homogeneous. As of now those are the main assumptions given what we know and what we can measure. Any stories we make about reality including science are at most our current best bet and nothing more. We can always learn something new that will rewrite anything we know currently. Like imagine we prove last Thursdayism is true.

  • blarg_dunsen@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    53
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Somewhere, somewhen, there is a version of me who made all the right decisions and is living a truly great life.

    And everyday I give big props to them, while just doing the best I can each day and continue making questionable decisions sometimes.

    • bitjunkie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      8 hours ago

      There are also versions of you who made all the right decisions and are still living garbage lives because no decision in their control actually had an influence on the overall outcome. These versions are far more numerous.

  • the_q@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Ah yes… The spiritualism of the intelligent. It’s different than religious beliefs, right?

    • Pudutr0n@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Ah yes, the hubris of man. Cause we can totally prove logic works without using logic, right?

      • the_q@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Which is more logical: some supernatural, indefinable thing or cold finality?

        You can’t prove either, but one is foundational to shared delusions that drives commerce, hatred and war while the other is just peace.

          • the_q@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            7 hours ago

            Explain how it’s a deity. I don’t worship it. It doesn’t give me purpose. It’s not a comfort.

            • JcbAzPx@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              4 hours ago

              the other is just peace.

              That sounds a lot like you consider it a comfort.

              Nothing isn’t peace, it’s nothing.

            • Pudutr0n@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              7 hours ago

              You pushed the inexplicable, the black box, into a system. Deities/the unknown forces come in all kinds of shapes and formats, not only judeochristian / abrahamic. Maybe it’s not a deity, but it’s where the magic we can’t explain happens. We need axioms for anything, dude. I’m not anti-science, I just think all belief and knowledge is necessarily based in things that cannot be proven… and that’s ok.