• boonhet@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Well that’s oversimplifying it quite a bit.

    If I eat plants from my own garden, there’s no methane used in the fertilizer because I don’t use fertilizer. Yet my noxious-ass intestines will produce methane from something that wasn’t methane before.

    It’s the whole reason they wanted to tax cow farts here. Your cows could be eating all natural grass that hasn’t been fertilized at all, but they’re turning other carbon compounds into methane.

    And methane is an order of magnitude worse than CO2 for global warming long term.

    • betanumerus@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Well that’s overcomplicating it quite a bit. Just look at the carbon-based molecules. Lump CO2 and CH4 together. Their ratio can be approximated as a constant over some time so who cares. Part if is from newly extracted fossil material, part of the lot is recycled. That’s it.

      • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Their ratio can be approximated as a constant over some time so who cares

        The people on a burning planet probably?

        You don’t need ANY fossils to be dug up to produce methane, or CO2 for that matter. Of course it helps.

        • betanumerus@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          I have no idea who you’re arguing with or what’s your point. But have a nice day.