You’re just hear to debate the quality of evidence! Of course that must be it!
No I’m simply saying you should provide evidence for your claims instead of crashing out and throwing a tantrum demanding others prove a negative.
The DPRK people you met are part of an elite class connected to the regime. Of course they support it.
I never realised farmers learning agricultural science in a neighboring country were an elite class. (Also I don’t think you know what the word class really means). Regime is a silly word (“government I don’t like”).
The burden of proof is on you. You’re making the claim. Also it’s not an adhominem you should look up what words mean if you don’t know before using them.
ad hominem
Attacking a person’s character or motivations rather than a position or argument.
I did no such thing. I simply said you need to provide evidence for your claims instead of demanding others prove a negative.
Pointing out you are throwing a tantrum does not an ad hominem make.
No I’m simply saying you should provide evidence for your claims instead of crashing out and throwing a tantrum demanding others prove a negative.
I never realised farmers learning agricultural science in a neighboring country were an elite class. (Also I don’t think you know what the word class really means). Regime is a silly word (“government I don’t like”).
Removed by mod
The burden of proof is on you. You’re making the claim. Also it’s not an adhominem you should look up what words mean if you don’t know before using them.
ad hominem
Attacking a person’s character or motivations rather than a position or argument.
I did no such thing. I simply said you need to provide evidence for your claims instead of demanding others prove a negative.
Pointing out you are throwing a tantrum does not an ad hominem make.
This isn’t an ad hominem. This is: you are as smart as a rock and therefore you are wrong.