• AmbitiousProcess (they/them)@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        35
        ·
        7 hours ago

        It wasn’t just the update cycle either, it’s that they don’t have the physical hardware chips to support Graphene’s minimum requirements for security, which would severely weaken any benefits you actually get from GrapheneOS.

          • AmbitiousProcess (they/them)@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            33
            ·
            6 hours ago

            Entirely lacking disk encryption for typical users due to not having a secure element is a pretty major flaw.

            It’s also missing hardware accelerated virtualization which is necessary for much of GrapheneOS’s sandboxing, has weak security for other keys in the OS keystore, is missing hardware memory tagging which makes it much easier for apps to use overflow attacks, doesn’t have proper verified boot support once a custom alternative OS is flashed, and leaves exposed debugging APIs even when the phone is locked.

            This breaks:

            • Secure app spawning
            • Memory corruption protection
            • Integer overflow protection
            • Most of Graphene’s kernel hardening
            • Much of Graphene’s attack surface reduction abilities
            • Hardware-based attestation and security monitoring
            • Quick tile protection pre-unlock
            • Debugging access prevention
            • Verified Boot
            • The security of your PIN against any automated attack

            At that point, GrapheneOS can’t physically provide you essentially any security anymore.

            • devfuuu@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              6 hours ago

              It really depends on what security level you want out of a phone. Most people are concerned with a pickpocket stealing and being able to access everything. Most of the world doesn’t need the security level required to pass through the united states border control. Which they will just force to put the pin anyways or put you in jail for even having a secure device.

              • AmbitiousProcess (they/them)@piefed.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                3 hours ago

                It really depends on what security level you want out of a phone

                It does, but that’s exactly my point. GrapheneOS will provide you essentially no more security than any other alternative Android operating system, should it have to operate on a Fairphone with all those features not supported by a Fairphone stripped away.

                Unless Fairphone adds more hardware security features that are standard on most other phones, and highly supported on Pixels, installing a heavily crippled GrapheneOS on a Fairphone would get you essentially none of the benefits of GrapheneOS in the first place.

              • rumba@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                5 hours ago

                Well sans duress password being a good idea now, when you get to the border, you can either unlock it or they’ll just confiscate it. You don’t get to be on their list and go through with a phone because they can’t manage to decrypt it.