• CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 hour ago

    Any non profit company who’s products isn’t a proprietary third party software launcher.

    You’re being disingenuous. You know full well the context of the argument precludes non-profits.

    They have built a semi-monopoly on videogames relying for two decades on closed source products and windows, they are now looking at the linux share because microsoft in the past years made bullish acquisitions in the videogames industry.

    You might want to check your math on that. Steam on Windows was originally released in 2003, and released on Linux in 2013.

    And the reason for their interest has nothing to do with Microsoft’s game studio acquisitions, and everything to do with Microsoft’s attempts to lock down the Windows ecosystem back in the Windows 8/RT days.

    If the client doesn’t matter that much that’s even more reasons to release the source code.

    No one said it doesn’t matter. It’s their software/platform/service. They can do whatever they want, and it’s their right to do so. If you don’t want to use their platform, you don’t have to.

    companies usually make money, non profit organizations help people

    Usually. But the fact that Valve’s interests align with the benefits of its userbase isn’t a bad thing. Making money isn’t a crime, and making money while building a system people like also isn’t a bad thing.

    You seem to have a strange hatred towards Valve for simply existing. Are you friends with Tim Sweeney or something?