• f314@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Came to say this! Drug addicts need help, not jail. Sure, if they commit a crime police should be involved, but it’s not going to cure their addiction!

        • Karmanopoly@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          12 hours ago

          I mean if you want to get specific what I really want is to remind police that doing drugs is illegal and they should focus on busting those people…instead of kids having fun on scooters

            • village604@adultswim.fan
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              28
              ·
              11 hours ago

              In the US it’s so they can give black people felonies for being black so they can’t vote.

              That’s literally what started the war on drugs. Well, blacks and hippies.

              • Jeena@piefed.jeena.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 hour ago

                This is also why alcohol, which is a way more harmful drug to others than all of the illegal drugs[1], is legal.

                [1] https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21036393/

                Findings: MCDA modelling showed that heroin, crack cocaine, and metamfetamine were the most harmful drugs to individuals (part scores 34, 37, and 32, respectively), whereas alcohol, heroin, and crack cocaine were the most harmful to others (46, 21, and 17, respectively). Overall, alcohol was the most harmful drug (overall harm score 72), with heroin (55) and crack cocaine (54) in second and third places.

          • mastertigurius@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            8 hours ago

            Busting drug addicts will do ZERO to help the drug and crime problems. Even law enforcers will tell you that.

            Those problems are so much more complex, and require fundamental reforms in social policies, mental healthcare, education, youth programmes, city planning etc. And then there’s the issue of dealing with the gangs, smugglers and foreign organized syndicates bringing the stuff into the country.

            Kids driving recklessly on scooters (which are often modified) are:

            A) A danger to themselves

            B) A danger to pedestrians they could crash into

            C) A serious danger to cars that swerve to avoid them when they go out on the main road.

          • Takapapatapaka@tarte.nuage-libre.fr
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            20
            ·
            11 hours ago

            riding scooter at 12 seems to be illegal too in vancouver, and people have fun on drugs too, so seems to me both things are pretty much interchangeable in your argument

      • Lumelore (She/her)@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Putting someone in timeout maybe works for three year olds but it doesn’t work for adults even if you hold them there 1000 times longer. Restitution and rehabilitation is a significantly more effective solution and results in much lower recidivism. Only reason to lock someone in a box is if they present a significant danger to the public, and that’s not to punish them, but to protect others.