• Master@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    2 hours ago

    A 10 min ride home is not the same as a 3 hour wedding and 12 hours processing images and video.

    • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 hours ago

      By your logic you’re not paying for a 10 minute ride home. You’re paying for a 15 minute drive to your point of origin, a 10 minute ride home, a 15 minute ride elsewhere, in time, fuel, maintenance, insurance, car payment, interest on that payment and taxes.

      • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 hours ago

        It kind of is, but she’s making her argument poorly.

        If you want a professional photography shoot, there is a minimal expectation on equipment above whatever your phone can do. That equipment costs significant money to own.

        There is also the money to pay for someone’s time for the shoot, which she argues for poorly. Even though photography is a hobby, selling services is a commitment of time to reach a certain minimum standard. That time is worth something.

        • MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 hours ago

          selling services is a commitment of time to reach a certain minimum standard.

          Ok, but i want a wedding photo, not a Van Gogh.

          • kestrel7_7@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            1 hour ago

            Then get your friends/family to take pics with their phones, and don’t hire a wedding photographer. No one is forcing you to. Just don’t then go on to complain if the specific moments you want are missed/blurry/composition sucks.

            Like, maybe this is a controversial opinion, but of all the people trying to rip you off in the world, photographers are pretty low on the list.

      • boonhet@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 hours ago

        If she’s even real (could be a troll account), we have no idea what she’s talking about. Quick half hour or shorter shoot for your family after getting a new baby? A wedding lasting hell, maybe 5-6 hours or more? 300 bucks is way too much for the first option (assuming she has a studio and can just shoot 1.5 families an hour and then do the editing later) and probably about a fifth of what the second option should cost.

    • ClownStatue@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Not to mention the skill of moving around a wedding in an unobtrusive manner so as to both capture great shots and not distract from the ceremony too much. A good wedding photographer is worth more than $100-300. But, people getting married should get what they can afford. Even if that’s a ride to the courthouse and your friend with the newest smartphone that has the better camera. Great photos are nice to have. Any photo from your wedding is going to bring back the memory.