• ruby@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    reread what, your comments about how not wanting a partner to cheat on you somehow equals sexual oppression? wouldn’t policing what kind of relationships people are allowed to have (aka what you’re trying to do) be closer to domineering?

    • alapakala@quokk.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 hour ago

      I never said anything about my partners, or my choices, but those in that snapchat, that made it all the way to threadiverse!
      I don’t police. The people in the snapchat do.
      They even made it a spectacle!

      • ruby@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        53 minutes ago

        they police that the guy is lying to his wife and having a secret relationship behind her back, and they’re very right to police that. cheating on a person you supposedly love for life is vile and disgusting and the wife has every right to be upset that her husband is secretly pursuing romantic partners behind her back (and judging by the sitting woman’s expression, she likely doesn’t know, so he’s likely hiding his marriage from her too).

        is posing with a sign in public and making a scene distasteful? yeah, might be. but it’s nowhere as bad as cheating.

        that’s also assuming that the situation is real, which i doubt. but it applies to all cheaters in general regardless of this specific image.

        • alapakala@quokk.au
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          39 minutes ago

          they’re very right to police that

          This is where we disagree, morally, politically, and ethically. And why

          I disavowed this anti-autonomy act.

          nowhere as bad as cheating.

          But is child marriage ok?

          situation is real

          It was. Scroll up to the tumblr proof.