themachinestops@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 7 小时前Chinese humanoid robots smash human records in 100m sprint and high jump at Beijing robot gamesapnews.comexternal-linkmessage-square38fedilinkarrow-up159 cross-posted to: technology@midwest.socialtechnology@lemmy.mltechnology@piefed.socialtechnology@beehaw.org
arrow-up159external-linkChinese humanoid robots smash human records in 100m sprint and high jump at Beijing robot gamesapnews.comthemachinestops@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 7 小时前message-square38fedilink cross-posted to: technology@midwest.socialtechnology@lemmy.mltechnology@piefed.socialtechnology@beehaw.org
minus-squarens1@feddit.uklinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up41·6 小时前Feels like “beating human records” is pretty meaningless for things that are… not human. I was intrigued to see what the entry criteria were since these are meant to be humanoid, but couldn’t find any real information on it.
minus-squareOaksey@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·2 小时前While i largely agree with your point, I’m sure the fact they can run faster than any human is of interest to various militarys.
minus-squaretechnocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·2 小时前No. The military already has drones that are far cheaper and faster than these pointless clunkers.
minus-squareplantfanatic@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up23·5 小时前Being able to balance and move realistically as a bipedal with speed is quite the feat though.
Feels like “beating human records” is pretty meaningless for things that are… not human. I was intrigued to see what the entry criteria were since these are meant to be humanoid, but couldn’t find any real information on it.
While i largely agree with your point, I’m sure the fact they can run faster than any human is of interest to various militarys.
No. The military already has drones that are far cheaper and faster than these pointless clunkers.
Being able to balance and move realistically as a bipedal with speed is quite the feat though.