• brucethemoose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    9 hours ago

    In my experience, the users behind this tend to be a state of AI Psychosis.

    They’re the kind of user who forked or started some giant project, with a wall of text and emojiis and tables in the readme, yet theres no concrete information on how well it actually works. They submit some gigantic PR that touches a ton of files… for a feature that already exists in the project, and they apparently werent aware of.

    And this is another tell. This is not some rogue agent like people think, its some person deep down a rabbit hole that might think they’re contributing to QEMU. They arent necessarily malicious; just a bit crazy.

    Malicious versions do exist, but thats usually motivated by grifters trying to pad their resume with contributions. Theyd do that on GitHub, not Gitlab.

  • dandi8@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    18 hours ago

    But I was told AI is actually great for open source now and accepted with open arms…! /s

    • bluGill@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      11 hours ago

      If you know what you’re doing, AI can be a very useful tool. However, a lot of people have no clue what they’re doing and they use AI to amplify their incompetence.

      • dandi8@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Maybe one day someone can actually prove the mythical usefulness of AI beyond software devs who think they’re 19% faster but are actually 10% slower.

    • Alex@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Some of the AI generated bug reports we get are good because the author had verified them, added a test case and at least reviewed if it is guest trigger able. Yesterday’s flood however was low effort spam.