• diablicja@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    13 hours ago

    I’m not saying it’s not code, I know it’s code. And it’s code because they’re all doing the open shower thing. Why else would they want the whole room waterproofed if not because the whole room routinely gets wet?

    • bus_factor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      It’s still code if your shower has a door. It’s not unusual to stick your washing machine in the bathroom, and even if you don’t, the toilet could always overflow.

      North America is really the only place I know of where bathrooms are not required to be waterproofed throughout.

      • diablicja@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Yeah, I’m saying they made it code because the doorless showers are the standard, not that putting door there would somehow invalidate the code.

        I come from another European country and the law only requires waterproofing the floor + wet areas (shower, around the bath etc.)

        • bus_factor@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          4 hours ago

          And I’m saying the code is there independently of doorless showers. The code was like that before doorless showers became common.

          In fact, if your shower has a door and the only drain is inside the shower, you are required to leave a gap under the door to allow water to flow into the shower.