• jpreston2005@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    I think a law saying no AI generated CSAM, whether or not the child depicted is real, isn’t an overreach into our fucking freedoms.

    • bedwyr@piefed.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      The same reasoning under our current criminal codes would open up anything and everything the authorities dislike to being forbidden.

      Same reason they overturned community moral standard laws a few decades back. Used against the worst cases they could find, but broad enough for them to target everything, like regular pornography. (30 year felony in the precedent setting case, shitholy state GA or something.)

          • jpreston2005@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 hours ago

            Damn this guy really wants his CSAM

            You disgust me. I’m just gonna block you because dealing with you further is negatively impacting my ability to feel empathy. I imagine you have that effect on a great number of persons. I pity the people in your life.

            • Amnesigenic@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              4 hours ago

              It’s literally just the nazi propaganda playbook for targeting queers, maintained by american conservatives ever since. If americans weren’t so fucking uneducated I wouldn’t need to explain this shit over and over again.

              https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LGBTQ_grooming_conspiracy_theory

              We already have laws against harming children, this shit isn’t about protecting anybody. Any attempt to illegalize a situation where there no actual human victim exists will inevitably be repurposed to target minorities and dissidents. Happened before, about to happen again thanks to countless moralistic morons just like you

        • bedwyr@piefed.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          That is what I read anyway. pedo in chief would presumably quash republican support for a new law, but really with all the dems they could get enough pubs to go along, maybe not to override a veto but enough to force the old baby raper in chief to publicly refuse to sign a law everyone supports, (assuming it’s not a freedom stealing bill, which it absolutely would be now that I think about it.)