• freagle@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    11 hours ago

    No no I understand that building the platform is expensive. That’s not in question. What’s in question is whether an expensive platform with very low price per shot eventually makes up for the platform cost.

    Likely it is intended to be used in concert with ballistics, not instead of. Laser have a very low peak rate of fire relative to ballistics, but have a very high duration of continuous field service relative to ballistics

    • partofthevoice@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Not to mention lasers move at the speed of light. That’s got to be a benefit, right? Is there no benefit realized from the boost there?

      • freagle@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 hours ago

        I think there is benefit there but not from a time-to-kill (since the laser kills via heat accumulation which takes some measurable time) but rather that it can be more responsive to evasive maneuvers from the target