United States Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent insisted his country is “not at war” with Canada, then proceeded to mock the threat Canada could pose to his country with “submarines from the Edmonton mall.”

The secretary also suggested Prime Minister Mark Carney was to blame for the current “political shouting match” between the two countries because keeping the fight alive is good for his poll numbers.

Bessent made the remarks Monday in an interview with the U.S. cable news network CNBC, where he was asked if his country is now in a trade war with Canada.

“Well, I don’t think you can be in a tit for tat with someone that’s 13 times larger than you are,” he said.

“I mean we’re not at war with Canada. How are we going to be at war with Canada? What, are they going to take their two submarines from the Edmonton mall and sic them on us?”

  • Jay@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    edit-2
    10 hours ago

    Your white house burned down long before modern submarines existed dude… sit down.

    • Reannlegge@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Trump has already started the tear down for us, it would not be as glorious this time but seeing a bunch of piss drunk Canadians do it again would be fun.

      • CapuccinoCoretto@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        10 hours ago

        The Canadian military did an analysis of how to fight a war with America. The study’s conclusion was the most devastating and effective strategy is to sit back and watch them destroy themselves.

        Best we can do for ourselves is to unplug from their systems.

        • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          7 hours ago

          It was assymetrixal warfare because any Canadian under US rule would join terrorist groups.

          Not the US destroying themselves.

        • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          edit-2
          9 hours ago

          If we’re thinking of the same study, that was because the US attempting to invade canada would be such a drastically unpopular move that it would kick off a US civil war in response. Also Canada wasn’t planning to sit back, but to not engage directly / do a guerilla for the actual invasion while supporting the pro-canada/sanity side with intelligence and materiel.

          It was never “watch them destroy themselves”, the last damn thing Canada wants is a gutted former superpower with an uncertain political outlook next door.

          • Jay@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            9 hours ago

            Makes sense. You don’t directly attack something 10 times your size, there’s plenty of other ways to fuck it up good and proper. Even neanderthals figured that out.

            • Jay@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              8 hours ago

              You’re half right though. Charging in won’t help, gotta let them get comfy and cocky, then you mess them up from behind.

      • Jay@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        9 hours ago

        I’d gladly be there with a bottle of whiskey in one hand, my Tiger Torch in the other.