• HCSOThrowaway@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    8 小時前

    Ooh, free lock-picking practice!

    I don’t think it would be illegal to non-destructively unlock that lock.

    - Ex-cop

      • thermal_shock@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        26 分鐘前

        Anything is practice. Repetitive behavior hones skills. Experience is experience, good or bad. Maybe the skill is doing in the open quick enough to not draw attention.

      • HCSOThrowaway@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        6 小時前

        I’m aware. If you really want a pedantry fight:

        Nothing about my comment implies it would be a long practice session.

        • wookiepedia@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 小時前

          Very curious about a hypothetical: You pick the lock and secure it elsewhere on the bench so that it’s not lost and accidentally affix a proper lock keeping the bench in the bench position.

        • NeatNit@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 小時前

          I was not looking for any kind of fight and I actually did suspect you knew. I was just hopping on the opportunity to mock Master Lock, since I know they make some of the worst locks on the market.

          Full disclosure: I have zero lock picking skills. I probably couldn’t pick this lock if I tried.

          • anewfox@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            56 分鐘前

            not just the worst, but they somehow manage to release new locks that are worse than their old ones, as well as new locks with positively ancient design flaws that every lock manufacturer absolutely knows about, like not including a rear shield in the core, meaning you can just… stick something in there and open it trivially. i’m talking design flaws from the 1800s and early 1900s. their most secure core is used in a PLASTIC LOTO LOCK and none of their metal locks, for no fucking reason. the incompetence is unbelievable.