Why assume straight porn is as potent as gay porn?
Rhetorical but homophobes don’t think that way. If you think being gay is some kind of aberration the way people think paedophilia is, you might think about gay porn, or positive gay characters in books, as showing that being gay is ok, leading to more people doing it.
Why assume straight porn is as potent as gay porn?
Rhetorical but homophobes don’t think that way. If you think being gay is some kind of aberration the way people think paedophilia is, you might think about gay porn, or positive gay characters in books, as showing that being gay is ok, leading to more people doing it.
Two men kissing is not porn
You would not believe how many conservatives disagree with you.
True but it’s what I thought about so you may draw your own conclusions
You’re right. Nobody mentioned anything constituting “porn” though - I think just “content” or “representation” is a better word choice.